ScreenshotAPI vs Screenshot Machine: Feature and Pricing Comparison
Compare ScreenshotAPI with Screenshot Machine. See how these two screenshot APIs differ in pricing, features, rendering quality, and developer experience.
Last updated: 2026-03-25
Try ScreenshotAPI free
5 free credits. No credit card required.
Screenshot Machine is one of the older screenshot API services, offering reliable basic captures at straightforward pricing. ScreenshotAPI is a newer alternative with modern features and a different pricing model. If you are comparing Screenshot Machine vs ScreenshotAPI for your project, this guide covers features, pricing, and rendering quality to help you decide.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | ScreenshotAPI | Screenshot Machine |
|---|---|---|
| PNG output | ✓ | ✓ |
| JPEG output | ✓ | ✓ |
| WebP output | ✓ | ✗ |
| Full-page capture | ✓ | ✓ |
| Custom viewport | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dark mode | ✓ | ✗ |
| Wait for network idle | ✓ | ✗ |
| Wait for CSS selector | ✓ | ✗ |
| Custom delay | ✓ | ✓ |
| Quality control | ✓ | ✓ |
| PDF generation | ✗ | ✓ |
| Device emulation | ✗ | ✓ (mobile/tablet presets) |
| Caching | ✗ | ✓ (configurable TTL) |
| Bulk capture | ✗ | ✗ |
| Watermark-free | ✓ | Paid plans only |
Screenshot Machine offers PDF generation and device emulation presets that ScreenshotAPI does not. ScreenshotAPI offers WebP output, dark mode capture, and advanced wait strategies that Screenshot Machine lacks.
Code Comparison
ScreenshotAPI
rubyrequire 'net/http' require 'uri' uri = URI('https://screenshotapi.to/api/v1/screenshot') uri.query = URI.encode_www_form( url: 'https://example.com', width: 1440, height: 900, type: 'webp', colorScheme: 'dark' ) request = Net::HTTP::Get.new(uri) request['x-api-key'] = 'sk_live_xxxxx' response = Net::HTTP.start(uri.hostname, uri.port, use_ssl: true) { |http| http.request(request) } File.binwrite('screenshot.webp', response.body)
Screenshot Machine
rubyrequire 'net/http' require 'uri' uri = URI('https://api.screenshotmachine.com/') uri.query = URI.encode_www_form( key: 'YOUR_KEY', url: 'https://example.com', dimension: '1440x900', format: 'png', delay: 2000 ) response = Net::HTTP.get_response(uri) File.binwrite('screenshot.png', response.body)
Both APIs are simple REST endpoints. Screenshot Machine passes the API key as a query parameter, while ScreenshotAPI uses a header, which is the more secure approach. Check the Ruby screenshot guide for more implementation details.
Pricing Comparison
ScreenshotAPI
| Plan | Credits | Price | Per Credit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | 5 | $0 | Free |
| Starter | 500 | $20 | $0.040 |
| Growth | 2,000 | $60 | $0.030 |
| Pro | 10,000 | $200 | $0.020 |
| Scale | 50,000 | $750 | $0.015 |
No subscription. Credits never expire.
Screenshot Machine
| Plan | Screenshots/month | Price/month | Per Screenshot |
|---|---|---|---|
| Micro | 1,000 | $9.95 | $0.00995 |
| Small | 5,000 | $19.95 | $0.00399 |
| Medium | 15,000 | $49.95 | $0.00333 |
| Large | 50,000 | $99.95 | $0.002 |
Monthly subscription. Unused screenshots do not carry over.
Which Pricing Works Better?
Screenshot Machine is cheaper per screenshot. At every tier, Screenshot Machine's per-unit cost is lower than ScreenshotAPI's. For steady, predictable volume, Screenshot Machine delivers more screenshots per dollar.
ScreenshotAPI avoids subscription waste. If your usage fluctuates, credits that never expire mean you only pay for what you actually capture. No monthly bills during quiet periods, and no lost credits at the end of the month.
For full pricing details, visit the pricing page.
Rendering Quality
Screenshot Machine uses a capable rendering engine, but it can lag behind on the latest web standards. Modern single-page applications built with React, Vue, or Svelte may not render fully with Screenshot Machine's default settings since it lacks the waitUntil=networkidle or waitForSelector options that let you ensure JavaScript has finished executing.
ScreenshotAPI uses a current Chromium engine with multiple wait strategies:
waitUntil=networkidlewaits for all network requests to completewaitUntil=loadwaits for the page load eventwaitUntil=domcontentloadedwaits for initial HTML parsingwaitForSelector=.my-elementwaits for a specific element to appear
These options make ScreenshotAPI more reliable for JavaScript-heavy pages.
Where Screenshot Machine Wins
Lower per-screenshot cost. Screenshot Machine is one of the most affordable screenshot APIs for consistent monthly volume.
PDF generation. Built-in PDF output is useful for generating documents from web pages.
Device presets. Mobile and tablet presets simplify responsive screenshot capture without calculating viewport sizes.
Caching. Configurable cache TTL can speed up repeated captures of the same URL and reduce API calls.
Established track record. Screenshot Machine has been operating for years with a straightforward, reliable service.
Where ScreenshotAPI Wins
Modern rendering. Current Chromium engine handles modern JavaScript frameworks, lazy-loaded content, and complex layouts.
WebP output. Smaller files mean faster loading for directory thumbnails and link previews.
Dark mode capture. Native colorScheme=dark support for capturing websites in dark mode.
Wait strategies. Network idle and selector-based waiting produce accurate screenshots of dynamic content.
Flexible pricing. No monthly commitment, no expiring credits. Buy and use at your own pace.
Secure authentication. Header-based API keys stay out of URLs, logs, and referrer headers.
Use Case Recommendations
Budget projects with steady volume
Screenshot Machine. Hard to beat on per-screenshot cost at consistent monthly volume.
Modern web applications
ScreenshotAPI. Better rendering engine and wait strategies handle React, Vue, and other JavaScript frameworks. Essential for accurate OG image generation from dynamic pages.
Variable or seasonal usage
ScreenshotAPI. Pay-as-you-go credits avoid monthly subscription waste.
PDF generation
Screenshot Machine. Built-in PDF support handles this use case that ScreenshotAPI does not cover.
Migration Guide
| Screenshot Machine | ScreenshotAPI |
|---|---|
key=KEY (in URL) | x-api-key: KEY (in header) |
dimension=1440x900 | width=1440&height=900 |
format=png | type=png |
delay=2000 | delay=2000 |
For more details, check the Screenshot Machine migration guide for a step-by-step walkthrough.
Integrating with Your Stack
ScreenshotAPI integrates with any language or framework through standard HTTP requests. For framework-specific guides:
- Next.js integration for React server components
- Express integration for Node.js backends
- Django integration for Python applications
- Laravel integration for PHP projects
- Rails integration for Ruby applications
For language-specific code samples beyond Ruby, check the JavaScript guide, Python guide, and Go guide.
Verdict
Choose Screenshot Machine if per-screenshot cost is your top priority, you need PDF generation, or you have predictable monthly volume.
Choose ScreenshotAPI if you need modern rendering quality, WebP output, dark mode capture, or flexible pay-as-you-go pricing. It is the better choice for capturing modern web applications accurately.
See the best screenshot API comparison for a broader look at the market.
Frequently asked questions
Is Screenshot Machine still a good choice?
Screenshot Machine is a reliable, long-running service that handles basic screenshot needs. However, it lacks modern features like WebP output, dark mode capture, and flexible wait strategies. Newer APIs offer more for similar or lower prices.
How does ScreenshotAPI pricing compare to Screenshot Machine?
Screenshot Machine charges $9.95/month for 1,000 screenshots. ScreenshotAPI offers 500 credits for $20 one-time (no monthly fee) or 2,000 credits for $60. ScreenshotAPI's credits never expire, making it more flexible for variable usage.
Does Screenshot Machine support modern JavaScript frameworks?
Screenshot Machine renders JavaScript but may struggle with complex SPAs and modern frameworks. ScreenshotAPI uses a current Chromium engine that handles React, Vue, and other modern frameworks reliably.
Can I switch from Screenshot Machine to ScreenshotAPI?
Yes. Both use REST APIs with similar parameter patterns. The main changes are the endpoint URL, authentication method, and parameter naming. Migration typically takes under an hour.
Related resources
Start capturing screenshots today
Create a free account and get 5 credits to try the API. No credit card required. Pay only for what you use.